Pioneer TS-A2011 3-Way 350W

Audio, Electronics and Lighting questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, zombie, Andrew

User avatar
muzzy66
Fast Driver
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:38 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby muzzy66 » Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:39 am

Yes and no.

An 8\" speaker will generally improve bottom end, at the expense of top end.

Depending on your budget, you woud get much, much better sound with a set of 6.5\" splits and an 8\" sub, rather then a set of 8\" coaxials.

Again, it all depends on whether your budget allows for something like this.

User avatar
Alex
Racing Driver
Posts: 1654
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:54 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Sydney

Re: So did you try them out or what?

Postby Alex » Sat May 03, 2008 4:02 am

m0b1liz3 wrote:They sound like a good option for those of us who don't want to install subs.

BTW, I would prefer to loose a little high end. MP3s tend to have more harsh harmonics and I would be happy to get rid of a little high end if it meant no listening fatigue...


use the equalizer
Image
Red NB8A - BD rollbar - Hardtop

User avatar
muzzy66
Fast Driver
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:38 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: So did you try them out or what?

Postby muzzy66 » Wed May 07, 2008 2:06 am

m0b1liz3 wrote:They sound like a good option for those of us who don't want to install subs.

BTW, I would prefer to loose a little high end. MP3s tend to have more harsh harmonics and I would be happy to get rid of a little high end if it meant no listening fatigue...


1) MP3's actually tend to do the opposite - the way the compression works it actually takes away the extremely high frequencies, it doesn't really make them harsher. Also, the difference between uncompressed auio and a good quality MP3 is essentially minimal - vast majority of people couldn't tell the difference, It's because of the way MP3 compression works - it's designed to take out bits of sound that us humans can't physically head, hence reducing file size without audible reducing sound quality. At 128kb/s 80% (maybe 90%) of people couldnt pick the difference between an uncompressed track, and an MP3 compressed version of the same track.

2) The loss wouldn't be in the high end, it'd be in the upper midrange around 1khz - 3khz. This is considered by many to be the most critical point in the sound specrum as it's where a good deal of music (especially vocals) lies.

wun911
Speed Racer
Posts: 2114
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:13 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

Postby wun911 » Thu May 08, 2008 1:10 pm

I think the numbers indicate the following:

TS-E2090 = 20 cm in diameter and 9 cm in depth
TS-A2011 = 20 cm in diameter and 11 cm in depth

I have the TS-E2090 and it fits easily (I use a MDF speaker rings 8 mm thick)
every ounce counts


Return to “MX5 Audio, Electronics & Lighting”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests