In communications to the owner and tuner, Darren, I said I was looking to make about 200-220wtq peak to keep the rods straight, which should yield me ~250whp. I picked up the car today, Darren did the full tune, worked hot and cold restarts, transient response, AFRs, timing and boost. And the result...

Well, that's not what I expected

I couldn't understand it. Less than 200whp!? What is this, a power curve for ants?! The dyno shows 200wtq at 6500rpm, that should give me ~240whp! Is his dyno miscalibrated? Am I being punked?!
Oh ... NM ... newton meters. Not ft-lbs...
So, 220ft-lbs of torque = ~300nm. 220nm = 162ft-lbs.
At least my rods should be safe

I just figured if we're talking Imperial Horsepower instead of Metric Kilowatts, then we're talking Imperial Foot Pounds as well and not Metric Newton Meters. He went an mixed his units of measure.

I noticed this once I got home and was able to examine the dyno graphs in a little more detail. The car drove home quite nicely, though if you've looked at the BOM today, you'll see the country is currently underwater with rain, so I didn't press on it. The car ran smoothly, no stumbles or jerks, and I had the AC on and off to deal with the misting thanks to the humidity, I'm generally quite happy with it based on that commute.
Co-incidentally, my AC still doesn't cool for sh*t!
I've emailed Autoworks back, explained the miscommunication. My plan is to drive the car this weekend, weather permitting, give it a good wring out and see how it feels. Then possibly arrange to go back in and up the boost a little. Darren mentioned the Borgwarner boost solenoid wasn't reacting very fast, so I might arrange to swap that to a MAC valve for better response. And I will try to get my Turbosmart wastegate actuator sorted so I can run a slightly stiffer spring than the Borg Warner low boost canister, but not as much as the medium boost canister - I suspect the low boost won't stretch much more than 12psi, and we're currently at 10psi, I expect I might want ~14psi to hit my goals.