Springs vs Shocks vs swaybars in clubman class

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, zombie, Andrew

User avatar
PeterB
Fast Driver
Posts: 451
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:20 pm
Vehicle: Non MX-5
Location: Canberra

Springs vs Shocks vs swaybars in clubman class

Postby PeterB » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:57 pm

I am allowed one more modification to my NB8A to run in clubman class as I already have a Torsen.

I want to go suspension, so am allowed good shocks or springs or swaybars, but only one. I also want to maintain a good road touring car, so low and stiff isn't the go for me.

I have 0.9 -ve camber front (maximum available) and 1.5 -ve rear. The car turns in ok, but pushes into understeer mid-corner, losing corner speed and cannot be balanced on the throttle.

Gus runs springs with considerable success, but it is fairly low and may compromise ride ?

Bryan has the Bilstein set-up which also is quick. If I go shocks I was thinking along the lines of Koni yellow adjustables with stock springs to maintain a good ride compromise.

Swaybars seem like they will control weight transfer, and may maintain the best road set-up, so this seemed another way to try.

Any-one with a quick Clubman class have a good reason to support either option, with the limitation of maintaining an acceptable ride height/ride for a daily user?
Peter B
MX5 free for present

manga_blue
Forum Guru
Posts: 4897
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Moruya, NSW

Re: Springs vs Shocks vs swaybars in clubman class

Postby manga_blue » Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:35 pm

Sways control weight transfer but don't really improve grip or laptimes although the car feels better.

Springs increase bounce frequency and do improve grip, braking dive and general control.

Shocks improve comfort, damping and provide fine adjustment of front/rear balance.

I'd go springs first in a combination that keeps the natural understeer/oversteer balance correct with the OEM sway bars.
7F/5R Kg/mm, 6/4 or 5/3 would work well. Obviously 7/5 is more track oriented whie 5/3 is more DD. I run 10/7 on Tein shocks with OEM sways on a daily driver but it's all on country roads with 100kmh limits. The harshness is not too obvious under those conditions. That setup is good enough for 1:12.1 at Wakie with a motor that only just keeps me up with standard NBs down the main straight.
’95 NA8

User avatar
StuwieP
Fast Driver
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:54 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Melbourne

Re: Springs vs Shocks vs swaybars in clubman class

Postby StuwieP » Thu Feb 19, 2015 9:47 pm

Not an expert, nor particularly on topic but could reducing the rear camber slightly help with your mid-corner understeer issues?
My NA6/SE build
Engine #1 RIP 04/07/2020

Magpie
Speed Racer
Posts: 7468
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Purga, QLD

Re: Springs vs Shocks vs swaybars in clubman class

Postby Magpie » Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:16 pm

----------------------------Stiffer-----------------------------------Softer
Front Sway Bar---------More Understeer--------------------- Less Understeer
Rear Sway Bar----------More Oversteer-----------------------Less Oversteer
Front Spring------------More Understeer---------------------Less Understeer
Rear Spring------------More Oversteer-----------------------Less Oversteer
Front Tire Pressure----Less Understeer----------------------More Understeer
Rear Tire Pressure----Less Oversteer------------------------More Oversteer
Front Shock------------More Understeer, later in turn-------Less Understeer, later in turn
Rear Shock------------More Oversteer, later in turn--------Less Oversteer, later in turn

Understeer corrections
Increase positive caster
More front toe out
Reduce rear toe in slightly
Increase front negative camber

Oversteer Corrections
More front toe in
Increase rear toe in
Reduce front negative camber
Reduce positive caster


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests