Red_Bullet wrote:I'm not very experienced, I've done about 8 or 9 track days so far and this was the first time in the wet. Similarly to you the difference between wet and dry was far more than I had expected. Basically I was 18 seconds slower in the wet than dry. 18 seconds is a LOT. That is why I asked the original question regarding camber as you put it "less grip = less corner speed = less body roll = less use of camber = less grip?"
Anyway I'm quite happy to accept that I'm a sh*t driver at he best of times and even more sh*t in the wet.
I suspect that the 50% tyres may have quite a lot to do with it though, not many people were as sh*t as me! Reviews of the particular tyres I'm running (Dunlop Direzza Z2's) indicate there are supposedly ok for wet conditions. That doesn't line up with my experience at all. I guess the only proof will be running something else next time it's wet, maybe KU36's or NT01's. Then I'll know for sure.
You've done more than me, but I wouldn't have been surprised to hear I was 20s slower at Sandown in the wet than in the dry. I do know at LeMans Kart's 700m track I went from 38s to 55s in the wet... that's 17 seconds over far shorter distance at far lower speeds.
Compounding factors:
Less traction due to water requires more skill to get good times.
Less experience usually equates to less skill, or at least less practice.
Psychological elements like, oh, damn, slippery and a few understeer moments (or, as I experienced, no-steer moments) plus locking up brakes easily takes confidence out.
Add to the mix potentially unsuitable tyres, especially if they're not displacing water as efficiently as they should?
Good luck next time! I suppose you'll get your answer if you're still 18s down on your dry times in the wet with new tyres? Or maybe be able to discount one thing.
Driving fast is hard at the best of times. I imagine driving well in the rain is a matter of yet more practice.
Cheers
Stu