Mr Morlock wrote::
- the NC is a very good shape - clean and no bad angles- lessons for other makers- but a stretch to call it a classic. The NB is closer to classic because you can see it design inspiration back to Lotus Elan albeit a far better car than the under done Brit.The retractable hard top on the NC is still the benchmark- the RF is not there. Some of us oldies also dont like low rent black wheels- like on the Mustangs- looks terrible. As for silly comments like bloated car that is unsupported by annoying things like facts. Take a look at Z4 or Boxster or 911 etc etc- all heavier cars than an NC. The NC had more KW than NB and by all accounts still a very robust and reliable car. The NC is still no heavyweight and it handles very well.
:
I agree with most of this (especially the Black rims comment) but want to clarify my "bloated" comment regarding NCs.
From any angle, the NC looks fatter than the NB at the same angle, it has nothing to do with the actual physical weight.
The NB is an NA with RX7 FD styling cues (ie. more curves and looks like someone has shrink-wrapped the sheetmetal over what's underneath).
The NC is a completely new car whose styling owes more to influences from the Mazda 3 and 6.
As for the ND becoming a classic, I doubt it.
Unlike many others, I love the rear of the ND, including the tail lights, but the front headlights look shiite and have been condemned on virtually every review of the car. The front end looks like something that was designed in this 5 year period and may or may not age well - a classic must look timeless as opposed to "trendy" (yes, that's the proper term all you pretentious designer twats out there who use the terms "On Trend" or "On Point" - sorry, got off track there, just want to smack all those guys in the head).
Have we de-railed this "I've ordered the best-est MX5 ever made and all others must pay homage to me!" thread enough or can we take it further?